CRYPTOZOOLOGY

 

So, You Don't Believe In Cryptozoology? 
By
Jordan P. Niednagel
©TrueAuthority.com - 3/02


...while you read

 

Jaguars In Arizona?

 

Thanks to a motion-activated camera set out in southern Arizona near the United States-Mexico border, game officials are now pretty certain that jaguars are visitors to the state.  In fact, they may even live there.  A photo taken in December of 2001 clearly shows a young male weighing about 175 lbs (80 kg).  One of the biggest cats in the Western Hemisphere, the jaguar once covered virtually all of Latin America.[11]

 

Crocodiles In Northwest Africa?

 

They’ve never been seen outside the Sahara; until now.  A 29-year-old Ph.D student at the University of Ulster in Coleraine recently discovered shy cave-dwelling crocodiles, a phenomenon never before imagined.  Why?  The remote region of Mauritania where they were found is a place of arid and unpredictable weather, yet somehow these reptiles have been able to survive by living in burrows and caves throughout the dry season.[12]

 

Lowe's servaline genet

 

It was only known from a single skin found in 1932, but now the Lowe’s servaline genet is a living reality.  It wasn’t caught, nor was it even filmed.  A single photograph recently taken by a team from the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) confirmed the survival of the creature, a mongoose-like African predator that is probably nocturnal and tree dwelling.  Amazingly, that’s pretty much all that is known about it.[13]

 

Two New Monkey Species Discovered

 

Making headlines in June of this year was the discovery of two new species of titi monkey in Brazil's Amazon rain forest.  One of the species found, Prince Bernhard's titi monkey, has extraordinary dark orange sideburns, chest and inner sides of its limbs, along with a reddish-brown back and a white-tipped black tail.  Says Russell Mittermeier, president of Conservation International, “we are once again surprised by the discovery of even more species."[14]

 

 

The Importance

 

Why share this information?  What importance does it hold?  Here are four truths I have established.

 

New aquatic animals are still being discovered

New land animals are still being discovered

Animals thought to be extinct are being discovered

Animals are still being discovered in the “wrong” places

 

Therefore, I have effectively established the reality that cryptozoology, the study of hidden animals, is nothing less than a science.

 

Now that cryptozoology has been authenticated, let me ask a few questions.

 

If the megamouth shark, giant squid, and coelacanth have been able to elude man’s detection, who’s to say that a plesiosaur, the classic long-necked marine reptile of “prehistoric times,” could still not be out there eluding our detection to this very day?  “Because the plesiosaur went extinct millions of years ago,” says the evolutionary skeptic.  “Of course,” I reply by means of their reasoning.  “And so did the coelacanth.”

 

Perhaps, just maybe, they didn’t live millions of years ago.

 

If the okapi, komodo dragon, and Chacoan peccary have been able to elude man’s detection, who’s to say that an apatosaur, the classic long-necked dinosaur of “prehistoric times,” could not still be out there eluding man’s detection to this very day?  “Because the apatosaur went extinct millions of years ago,” says the evolutionary skeptic.  “Of course,” I reply by means of their reasoning.  “And so did the Chacoan peccary.”

 

Perhaps, just maybe, they didn’t live millions of years ago.

 

I’ll admit it.  I am a believer in Nessie, the long-necked water monster of Loch Ness, Scotland.  I’ll admit it. I am a believer in Mokele-mbembe, the long-necked land (and water) monster of the Likouala Swamp, Africa.  Why?  Because I believe in cryptozoology.  But most of all, I believe in creation.  You see, the creation model better allows for “living fossils,” animals alive today that, according to evolutionary thinking, appeared in the fossil record “hundreds of millions of years ago.”  Aside from the creatures I have already shared, the great white shark, nine-banded armadillo, crocodile, tuatara, sturgeon and horseshoe crab are just a few others.[15]  These are animals that have remained virtually unchanged from their ancestors.  In other words, they are “unevolutionized.”  And in order to convince someone of the reality of living dinosaurs (or marine reptiles), and from there use this information as a powerful tool in support of creation, the truths I have shared must be established. 

 

To the evolutionist:  I do not intend to use this information as proof, only support.  The more support we can establish from all facets of life, including cryptozoology, the more the puzzle of our past comes together, and reveals the true picture.

 

To the creationist:  If you endeavor to use this information in debate, make sure you follow the logical sequence.  Don't jump to, say, "point 5," without first dealing with the first 4 points.

 

To the cryptozoologist:  If using this information in a discussion or debate, you must establish, as I have done, that cryptozoology, the study of hidden animals, is a fact, not just speculation.  Refer to the animals recently discovered in this article, and from there move to the more "hard-to-swallow" cryptids, such as Nessie and Mokele-mbembe.

 

 

 

References:

 

 

1. The Discovery, <http://cosmic.swau.edu/~cstorz/discovery.html>, 20 October 2002.

2. Mysterious Creatures, Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 20-21.

3. Sandiegozoo.com, <www.sandiegozoo.org/wildideas/kids/got_questions_peccary.html>, 21 October 2002.

4. Ref. 2.

5. Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 Standard (CD), article:  ‘ocean and oceanography’.

6. Facts & Figures, <www.ocean98.org/fact.htm>, 20 October 2002.

7. Discovery.com, <http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/giantsquid/feature/feature.html>, 21 October 2002.

8. FS Crypto Corner, <www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/cwhale2.htm>, (first reported 9 April 2001).

9. The Sydney Morning Herald, <www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/13/1023864317688.html>, (reported 13 June 2002).

10. Ref. 8, <www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/cspecies.htm>, (first reported 11 November 2001).

11. Sierraclub.org, <http://arizona.sierraclub.org/paloverde/jaguar.html>, (reported 4 February 2002).

12. The Telegraph, <http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/04/13/wcroc13.xml

&sSheet=/news/2002/04/13/ixworld.html>, 21 October 2002.

13. Nationalgeographic.com, <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/06/0620_020620_genet.html>, (reported 20 June 2002).

14. Science Daily, <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020625063029.htm>, (posted 26 June 2002).

15. Enature.com, <http://www.enature.com/fieldguide/livingfossils/living_fossils_home.asp>,  22 October 2002.

 

 

Back

 

 

 

TOP

 


 

Jaguar
"A young male weighing approximately 175 lbs"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coelacanth

"Caught in 1938"

 

 

Chacoan Peccary

"Became extinct thousands of years ago"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

©TrueAuthority.com - All Rights Reserved
true@trueauthority.com - Best Viewed With IE 6.0 Or Above
Fax (240) 376-3041